Transparency alternatives to Firstup
Other Retail operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Firstup. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Firstup on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Firstup has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Firstup” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Firstup | Found at Firstup, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MangoAppsmangoapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MangoApps | 70/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| YOOBICyoobic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YOOBIC | 70/100 | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Repslyrepsly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Repsly | 65/100 | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Axeroaxerosolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axero | 61/100 | 2 Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Simpplrsimpplr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simpplr | 61/100 | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Haiilohaiilo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Haiilo | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Jostlejostle.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Jostle | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Wiserwiser.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wiser | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Happeohappeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Happeo | 43/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Interactinteractsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Interact | 39/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Legionlegion.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Legion | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Aurorauror.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Auror | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.