Transparency alternatives to MangoApps
Other Retail operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at MangoApps. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from MangoApps on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
MangoApps has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at MangoApps” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at MangoApps | Found at MangoApps, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOOBICyoobic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YOOBIC | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Firstupfirstup.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Firstup | 61/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Simpplrsimpplr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simpplr | 61/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Happeohappeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Happeo | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Repslyrepsly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Repsly | 65/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Axeroaxerosolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axero | 61/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Legionlegion.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Legion | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| GoSpotCheckgospotcheck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoSpotCheck | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| ProfitTraxsmartretailsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProfitTrax | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Retail Acuityretailacuity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Retail Acuity | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Workvivoworkvivo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Workvivo | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Pepperipepperi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pepperi | 13/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.