Transparency alternatives to Simpplr
Other Retail operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Simpplr. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Simpplr on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Simpplr has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Simpplr” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Simpplr | Found at Simpplr, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MangoAppsmangoapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MangoApps | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| YOOBICyoobic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YOOBIC | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Axeroaxerosolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axero | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Firstupfirstup.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Firstup | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Repslyrepsly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Repsly | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Haiilohaiilo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Haiilo | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Interactinteractsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Interact | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Flipgetflip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flip | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| GoSpotCheckgospotcheck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoSpotCheck | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Jostlejostle.meSee also Transparency alternatives to Jostle | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Blinkjoinblink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Blink | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| ThoughtFarmerthoughtfarmer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ThoughtFarmer | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.