Alternatives to Simpplr
Other Retail operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Simpplr does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Simpplr on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Simpplr has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Simpplr does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Simpplr does not | Simpplr publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Axeroaxerosolutions.com | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Firstupfirstup.io | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| YOOBICyoobic.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Iglooigloosoftware.com | 43/100 | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Repslyrepsly.com | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| MangoAppsmangoapps.com | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Blinkjoinblink.com | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Haiilohaiilo.com | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Interactinteractsoftware.com | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Flipgetflip.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| GoSpotCheckgospotcheck.com | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Jostlejostle.me | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.