Transparency alternatives to Interact
Other Retail operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Interact. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Interact on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Interact has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Interact” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Interact | Found at Interact, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YOOBICyoobic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YOOBIC | 70/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Firstupfirstup.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Firstup | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Simpplrsimpplr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simpplr | 61/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| MangoAppsmangoapps.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MangoApps | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Repslyrepsly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Repsly | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Axeroaxerosolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axero | 61/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Happeohappeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Happeo | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Legionlegion.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Legion | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Haiilohaiilo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Haiilo | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Aurorauror.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Auror | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Flipgetflip.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flip | 30/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| GoSpotCheckgospotcheck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GoSpotCheck | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.