Transparency alternatives to ClickPoint
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ClickPoint does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from ClickPoint on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ClickPoint has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ClickPoint does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ClickPoint does not | ClickPoint publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.com | 74/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +5 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.com | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Hunterhunter.io | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.com | 65/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Scratchpadscratchpad.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Apolloapollo.io | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| ZoomInfozoominfo.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Mixmaxmixmax.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Snov.iosnov.io | 62/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Fathomfathom.video | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| PhantomBusterphantombuster.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Revenue.iorevenue.io | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.