Transparency alternatives to Cludo
Other Search and vector infrastructure vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Cludo. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Cludo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cludo has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Cludo” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Cludo | Found at Cludo, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromatrychroma.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chroma | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Pineconepinecone.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Pinecone | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Parallelparallel.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Parallel | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Vectaravectara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectara | 61/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gleanglean.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Glean | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Hebbiahebbia.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hebbia | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Vespavespa.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Vespa | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Addsearchaddsearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Addsearch | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Voyage AIvoyageai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Voyage AI | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LanceDBlancedb.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LanceDB | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Meilisearchmeilisearch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meilisearch | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Valyuvalyu.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Valyu | 26/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.