Transparency alternatives to Stora
Other Self storage management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Stora. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 19 that differ from Stora on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Stora has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Stora” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Stora | Found at Stora, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Easy Storage Solutionsstorageunitsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easy Storage Solutions | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Storablestorable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storable | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Tenant Inctenantinc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tenant Inc | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| OpenTech Allianceopentechalliance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenTech Alliance | 35/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| QuikStorquikstor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to QuikStor | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Unit Tracunittrac.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unit Trac | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| DoorSwapdoorswap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DoorSwap | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Syrasoftsyrasoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Syrasoft | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| 6Storage6storage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 6Storage | 13/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Cubbycubbystorage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cubby | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| CallPotentialcallpotential.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CallPotential | 9/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Janus Internationaljanusintl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Janus International | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.