Transparency alternatives to DoorSwap
Other Self storage management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at DoorSwap. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 18 that differ from DoorSwap on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
DoorSwap has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at DoorSwap” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at DoorSwap | Found at DoorSwap, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenTech Allianceopentechalliance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenTech Alliance | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Storastora.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Stora | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| QuikStorquikstor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to QuikStor | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Unit Tracunittrac.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Unit Trac | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Easy Storage Solutionsstorageunitsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easy Storage Solutions | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Storablestorable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storable | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tenant Inctenantinc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tenant Inc | 17/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cubbycubbystorage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cubby | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| 6Storage6storage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 6Storage | 13/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| SiteLinksitelink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SiteLink | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Stormanstorman.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storman | 13/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| CallPotentialcallpotential.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CallPotential | 9/100 | 1 Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.