SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to QuikStor

Other Self storage management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at QuikStor. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 18 that differ from QuikStor on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

QuikStor has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at QuikStor” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at QuikStorFound at QuikStor, not found there
Storastora.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Stora 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Easy Storage Solutionsstorageunitsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easy Storage Solutions 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
OpenTech Allianceopentechalliance.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenTech Alliance 35/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
PTI Security Systemsptisecurity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PTI Security Systems 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Storablestorable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Storable 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Tenant Inctenantinc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tenant Inc 17/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
6Storage6storage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 6Storage 13/100 1 Data processing agreement 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cubbycubbystorage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cubby 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
SiteLinksitelink.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SiteLink 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
CallPotentialcallpotential.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CallPotential 9/100 1 Status page with history 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
DoorSwapdoorswap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DoorSwap 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Radius Plusradiusplus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Radius Plus 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.