SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sendcloud. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 80 that differ from Sendcloud on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Sendcloud has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Sendcloud” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SendcloudFound at Sendcloud, not found there
Intrisintris.beSee also Transparency alternatives to Intris 22/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 Compare
AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip 83/100 1 Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack 43/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco 39/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus 35/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
parcelLabparcellab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to parcelLab 26/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Cargosoncargoson.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cargoson 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 Compare
Flexportflexport.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flexport 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 Compare
MyParcelmyparcel.nlSee also Transparency alternatives to MyParcel 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 Compare
Atlassys TMSatlassys-tms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlassys TMS 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 Compare
Cargobasecargobase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cargobase 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 Compare
FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites 48/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.