Alternatives to Sendcloud
Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Sendcloud does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Sendcloud on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sendcloud has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Sendcloud does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Sendcloud does not | Sendcloud publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AfterShipaftership.com | 83/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| Cargobasecargobase.com | 14/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| FourKitesfourkites.com | 52/100 | 1 Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bringgbringg.com | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| EasyPosteasypost.com | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Easyshipeasyship.com | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Metapackmetapack.com | 43/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onfleetonfleet.com | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Freightosfreightos.com | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Cargosoncargoson.com | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| nShiftnshift.com | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| project44project44.com | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.