Transparency alternatives to AfterShip
Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at AfterShip. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 82 that differ from AfterShip on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
AfterShip has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at AfterShip” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at AfterShip | Found at AfterShip, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intrisintris.beSee also Transparency alternatives to Intris | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack | 43/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| parcelLabparcellab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to parcelLab | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Cargosoncargoson.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cargoson | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Cargobasecargobase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cargobase | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Flexportflexport.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flexport | 17/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| MyParcelmyparcel.nlSee also Transparency alternatives to MyParcel | 13/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
| Atlassys TMSatlassys-tms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlassys TMS | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | Compare |
| Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud | 70/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Bringgbringg.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bringg | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.