SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Metapack

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Metapack does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 29 that differ from Metapack on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Metapack has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Metapack does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Metapack does notMetapack publishes, and they do not
AfterShipaftership.com 83/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
FourKitesfourkites.com 52/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Sendcloudsendcloud.com 61/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
EasyPosteasypost.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Onfleetonfleet.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Locuslocus.sh 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Bringgbringg.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Easyshipeasyship.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Freightosfreightos.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Wise Systemswisesystems.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
nShiftnshift.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
project44project44.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.