SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Elromco

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Elromco does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 82 that differ from Elromco on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Elromco has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Elromco does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Elromco does notElromco publishes, and they do not
AfterShipaftership.com 83/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Sendcloudsendcloud.com 70/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
FourKitesfourkites.com 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Bringgbringg.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
EasyPosteasypost.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Easyshipeasyship.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Metapackmetapack.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
ShipStationshipstation.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Cargobasecargobase.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Seven Senderssevensenders.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Waybillerwaybiller.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Freightosfreightos.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.