Transparency alternatives to Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC does not | Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expelexpel.com | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Huntresshuntress.com | 57/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pantherpanther.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ontinueontinue.com | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Corelightcorelight.com | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Corocoro.net | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Gigamongigamon.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Securonixsecuronix.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| WithSecurewithsecure.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Blumirablumira.com | 30/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cybereasoncybereason.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.