Transparency alternatives to Planable
Other Social media management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Planable. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Planable on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Planable has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Planable” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Planable | Found at Planable, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dash Socialdashsocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dash Social | 70/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Sprinklrsprinklr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sprinklr | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Sprout Socialsproutsocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sprout Social | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Statusbrewstatusbrew.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Statusbrew | 70/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Agorapulseagorapulse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agorapulse | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Hootsuitehootsuite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hootsuite | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Brandwatchbrandwatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandwatch | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Vista Socialvistasocial.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vista Social | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Khoroskhoros.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Khoros | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Emplifiemplifi.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Emplifi | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Publerpubler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Publer | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Laterlater.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Later | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.