Transparency alternatives to Recruit CRM
Other Staffing agency software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Recruit CRM. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Recruit CRM on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Recruit CRM has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Recruit CRM” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Recruit CRM | Found at Recruit CRM, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kordiskordisai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kordis | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Loxoloxo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Loxo | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Beamerybeamery.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beamery | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Gemgem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gem | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Crelatecrelate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crelate | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Firefishfirefishsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firefish | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Recruiterflowrecruiterflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Recruiterflow | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Hireflowhireflow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hireflow | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Trufflstruffls.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Truffls | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Vincerevincere.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Vincere | 22/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Compleetcompleet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Compleet | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Helixmein-helix.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Helix | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.