Transparency alternatives to Gem
Other Staffing agency software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Gem. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 33 that differ from Gem on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Gem has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Gem” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Gem | Found at Gem, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loxoloxo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Loxo | 70/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Kordiskordisai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kordis | 70/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Bilflobilflo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bilflo | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Crelatecrelate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crelate | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Recruit CRMrecruitcrm.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Recruit CRM | 55/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Zvoovezvoove.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zvoove | 9/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Firefishfirefishsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Firefish | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Recruiterflowrecruiterflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Recruiterflow | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Beamerybeamery.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beamery | 30/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Hireflowhireflow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hireflow | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Trufflstruffls.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Truffls | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Tempworkstempworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempworks | 22/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.