Transparency alternatives to Recruiterflow
Other Staffing agency software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Recruiterflow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from Recruiterflow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Recruiterflow has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Recruiterflow” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Recruiterflow | Found at Recruiterflow, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loxoloxo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Loxo | 70/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Kordiskordisai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kordis | 70/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Recruit CRMrecruitcrm.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Recruit CRM | 55/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Gemgem.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gem | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Bilflobilflo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bilflo | 35/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Crelatecrelate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Crelate | 35/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Beamerybeamery.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beamery | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Hireflowhireflow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hireflow | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Trufflstruffls.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Truffls | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Tempworkstempworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempworks | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Zvoovezvoove.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zvoove | 9/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Vincerevincere.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Vincere | 22/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.