SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Coface

Other Supply chain risk vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Coface does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Coface on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Coface has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Coface does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Coface does notCoface publishes, and they do not
Assentassent.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Versoverso.de 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Circulorcirculor.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
LexisNexis Riskrisk.lexisnexis.com 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Achillesachilles.com 37/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
TrusTracetrustrace.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
ISNisnetworld.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dun & Bradstreetdnb.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dow Jones Riskdowjones.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
CRIFcrif.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Everstreameverstream.ai 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Exigerexiger.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.