SaaS Ranking
Menu

SaaS transparency ranking · Sales and marketing

Surveys and forms software

51 vendors · updated 2026-10-16 · 2 without enough data for a score

Survey and form builders, ranked by what they publish about how they handle response data.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Transparency means: published on the vendor's own site, readable without a login, found by us at the addresses we checked.

+5points above the median of every category we measure

  • Surveys and forms22
  • All categories17
Median transparency score, out of 100. Surveys and forms sits above the median across every category we measure.
  1. A0 0%
  2. B0 0%
  3. C3 6%
  4. D6 12%
  5. E11 22%
  6. F29 59%
49 vendors with a score; 2 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.
All filters
Show only vendors where we found

Transparency band

2 without enough data for a band

51 vendors

Sort by

Not in the ranking

We could not measure these products with our method, so they are listed here instead of being scored. This says something about our method, not about the vendor.

Before the demo

Form builder software: a practical trial checklist

Follow one response from the first question to a usable export.

Test every route through the form

List the possible branches before configuring them. Submit a response through each route, then go back and change the answer that controls a branch. Inspect whether an answer to a now-hidden question remains in the submission. Repeat with an empty required field, a long response and an attachment at the configured limit. For scored surveys or calculated fields, retain the expected calculation and compare it with the exported value. Record the form version used so later edits do not make the trial impossible to reproduce.

Complete the task without a pointer

Use the keyboard to reach every field, select an option, correct an error and submit. Confirm that labels and instructions remain visible when the form is embedded on the intended page. Ask a reviewer using assistive technology to assess the real task. The W3C forms tutorial covers labels, grouping, instructions, validation and feedback; use these topics to structure the review. A template description or a vendor accessibility statement does not replace testing the configuration your visitors will actually encounter.

Follow one submission through a failed connection

Give each fictional response an identifier. Verify the confirmation, notification and destination record against that identifier. Pause a trial integration, submit a response and inspect how the failure is shown, who can see it and how the response is retried. Check for duplicate records after retrying. Repeat with the ordinary staff role instead of an administrator. Ask which features require another service or a higher plan. Keep a successful submission and a recovered failure as separate trial records.

Full trial checklist and CSV worksheet

A trial you can repeat

Build one short form using fictional information: a contact field, a choice that changes the next question, a required field and an optional attachment. Write down the expected response before submitting it. Repeat as a mobile visitor and a keyboard user, then follow the response into the notification, connected system and export. Use the same tasks in each product so attractive templates do not decide the comparison.

The W3C tutorial explains accessible form labels, groups, instructions, validation and user feedback. The branching, integration and export tasks are our editorial purchasing exercises. This checklist does not certify a form or a platform as accessible. W3C WAI: forms tutorial. Source reviewed 2026-10-03. The trial questions are editorial guidance, not additional measured criteria.

Narrow it down

Each of these lists the Surveys and forms vendors that meet one condition, with the source for each, and appears only where at least 8 of them meet it.

This category, criterion by criterion

How this market does on each criterion, with its own share and how it compares with the rest.

Head-to-head comparisons

Each comparison lists only the criteria where the two differ, with the source for every one. All comparisons.

Every result links its source on the vendor page. A grey segment means we could not measure it, not that it is missing. See how we score.