Alternatives to Cypress
Other Test automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cypress does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Cypress on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cypress has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Cypress does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Cypress does not | Cypress publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Applitoolsapplitools.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Testsigmatestsigma.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| ACCELQaccelq.com | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Applauseapplause.com | 39/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Allure TestOpsqameta.io | 30/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Leapworkleapwork.com | 17/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| BrowserStackbrowserstack.com | 63/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Katalonkatalon.com | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| PractiTestpractitest.com | 48/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Global App Testingglobalapptesting.com | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Rainforest QArainforestqa.com | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Testimtestim.io | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.