Alternatives to Testsigma
Other Test automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Testsigma does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Testsigma on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Testsigma has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Testsigma does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Testsigma does not | Testsigma publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypresscypress.io | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BrowserStackbrowserstack.com | 63/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Endtestendtest.io | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| PractiTestpractitest.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Katalonkatalon.com | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Applitoolsapplitools.com | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Applauseapplause.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Global App Testingglobalapptesting.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Testimtestim.io | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Xraygetxray.app | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Kobitonkobiton.com | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| QA Wolfqawolf.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.