Alternatives to Allure TestOps
Other Test automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Allure TestOps does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from Allure TestOps on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Allure TestOps has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Allure TestOps does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Allure TestOps does not | Allure TestOps publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cypresscypress.io | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| PractiTestpractitest.com | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| BrowserStackbrowserstack.com | 63/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
| Applitoolsapplitools.com | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Endtestendtest.io | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Katalonkatalon.com | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ACCELQaccelq.com | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Applauseapplause.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Rainforest QArainforestqa.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Xraygetxray.app | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Sauce Labssaucelabs.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Global App Testingglobalapptesting.com | 39/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.