SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Censys

Other Threat intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Censys does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Censys on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Censys has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Censys does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Censys does notCensys publishes, and they do not
Dataminrdataminr.com 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Feedly Threat Intelligencefeedly.com 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Cywarecyware.com 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Intezerintezer.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Cyblecyble.com 22/100 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Anomalianomali.com 43/100 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
IPinfoipinfo.io 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
GreyNoisegreynoise.io 30/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Intel 471intel471.com 26/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Pulsedivepulsedive.com 39/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Status page with history Compare
Recorded Futurerecordedfuture.com 22/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Group-IBgroup-ib.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.