Alternatives to Cyble
Other Threat intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cyble does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Cyble on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Cyble has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Cyble does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Cyble does not | Cyble publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dataminrdataminr.com | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Feedly Threat Intelligencefeedly.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Intezerintezer.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Anomalianomali.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Censyscensys.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| IPinfoipinfo.io | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Pulsedivepulsedive.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Cywarecyware.com | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GreyNoisegreynoise.io | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| AbuseIPDBabuseipdb.com | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Intel 471intel471.com | 26/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Flashpointflashpoint.io | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.