SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to IPinfo

Other Threat intelligence vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that IPinfo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from IPinfo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

IPinfo has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and IPinfo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and IPinfo does notIPinfo publishes, and they do not
Dataminrdataminr.com 70/100 6 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Feedly Threat Intelligencefeedly.com 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Anomalianomali.com 43/100 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cywarecyware.com 39/100 4 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Intezerintezer.com 48/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
GreyNoisegreynoise.io 30/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Intel 471intel471.com 26/100 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Cyblecyble.com 22/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Censyscensys.com 39/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Pulsedivepulsedive.com 39/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Recorded Futurerecordedfuture.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Group-IBgroup-ib.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.