SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Copernica

Other Transactional email and notifications vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Copernica does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 23 that differ from Copernica on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Copernica has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Copernica does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Copernica does notCopernica publishes, and they do not
Resendresend.com 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 1 Status page with history Compare
Mailosaurmailosaur.com 74/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Knockknock.app 65/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Mailtrapmailtrap.io 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Plunkuseplunk.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Novunovu.co 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Streamgetstream.io 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Ablyably.com 39/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
ClickSendclicksend.com 35/100 3 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Couriercourier.com 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated nothing Compare
Bentobentonow.com 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Batchbatch.com 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.