Transparency alternatives to Resend
Other Transactional email and notifications vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Resend. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Resend on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Resend has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Resend” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Resend | Found at Resend, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mailosaurmailosaur.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailosaur | 65/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Streamgetstream.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Stream | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| Ablyably.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ably | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| ClickSendclicksend.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClickSend | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Mailtrapmailtrap.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailtrap | 57/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | Compare |
| Plunkuseplunk.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plunk | 48/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Couriercourier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Courier | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Mission Inboxmissioninbox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mission Inbox | 39/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | Compare |
| SMTP2GOsmtp2go.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SMTP2GO | 39/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| SMTPetersmtpeter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SMTPeter | 36/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Batchbatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Batch | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +4 | Compare |
| Mauticmautic.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Mautic | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.