Alternatives to Mailtrap
Other Transactional email and notifications vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Mailtrap does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Mailtrap on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mailtrap has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Mailtrap does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Mailtrap does not | Mailtrap publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Resendresend.com | 83/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Mailosaurmailosaur.com | 74/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Ablyably.com | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Couriercourier.com | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Novunovu.co | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Streamgetstream.io | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Batchbatch.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Knockknock.app | 65/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Bentobentonow.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ClickSendclicksend.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Copernicacopernica.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Plunkuseplunk.com | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.