SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Ethereal

Other Transactional email and notifications vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ethereal does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Ethereal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ethereal has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Ethereal does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Ethereal does notEthereal publishes, and they do not
Resendresend.com 83/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 nothing Compare
Mailosaurmailosaur.com 74/100 9 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +6 nothing Compare
Knockknock.app 65/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Streamgetstream.io 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Ablyably.com 39/100 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 nothing Compare
Couriercourier.com 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Mailtrapmailtrap.io 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Novunovu.co 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Plunkuseplunk.com 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
ClickSendclicksend.com 35/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Bentobentonow.com 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Batchbatch.com 30/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.