SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Cytric

Other Business travel management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cytric does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 12 that differ from Cytric on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cytric has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Cytric does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Cytric does notCytric publishes, and they do not
BizAwaybizaway.com 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
BCD Travelbcdtravel.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Blacklaneblacklane.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Fairjunglefairjungle.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Itiliteitilite.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
TravelBanktravelbank.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
CWTmycwt.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Atlatosatlatos.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Goodwingsgoodwings.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Supertrippersupertripper.com 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Bolt Businessbolt.eu 13/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Notilusnotilus.fr 9/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.