SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Cogsdale

Other Utility billing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Cogsdale. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Cogsdale on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cogsdale has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Cogsdale” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at CogsdaleFound at Cogsdale, not found there
Kraken Technologieskraken.techSee also Transparency alternatives to Kraken Technologies 39/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Springbrookspringbrooksoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Springbrook 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
EnergyHubenergyhub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EnergyHub 17/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bidgelybidgely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bidgely 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Hansen Technologieshansencx.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hansen Technologies 13/100 1 Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Lumenazalumenaza.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Lumenaza 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Schleupenschleupen.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Schleupen 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Soptimsoptim.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Soptim 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Wilkenwilken.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Wilken 13/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Ferrantiferranti.beSee also Transparency alternatives to Ferranti 5/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Badger Meterbadgermeter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Badger Meter 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Harris Utilitiesharriscomputer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Harris Utilities 22/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.