SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to ScribbleVet

Other Veterinary practice software vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ScribbleVet does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from ScribbleVet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ScribbleVet has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and ScribbleVet does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and ScribbleVet does notScribbleVet publishes, and they do not
Weavegetweave.com 74/100 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 nothing Compare
ezyVetezyvet.com 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Vetstoriavetstoria.com 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
Provet Cloudprovet.cloud 41/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
IDEXXidexx.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named nothing Compare
NaVetornavetor.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Vetspirevetspire.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
PetDeskpetdesk.com 22/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Vet Radarvetradar.com 22/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Shepherdshepherd.vet 17/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
VETportvetport.com 13/100 1 Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Onward Vetonwardvet.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.