SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Simplecast

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Simplecast. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 47 that differ from Simplecast on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Simplecast has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Simplecast” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SimplecastFound at Simplecast, not found there
Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom 61/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux 52/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo 43/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 Compare
WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo 70/100 1 Certifications named 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Transistortransistor.fmSee also Transparency alternatives to Transistor 57/100 1 Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Vidyardvidyard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vidyard 57/100 1 Certifications named 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Descriptdescript.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Descript 48/100 1 Certifications named 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast 43/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Auphonicauphonic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Auphonic 39/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Acastacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acast 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 Compare
Movingimagemovingimage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Movingimage 35/100 1 Certifications named 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 Compare
SproutVideosproutvideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SproutVideo 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.