SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Auphonic

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Auphonic does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Auphonic on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Auphonic has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Auphonic does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Auphonic does notAuphonic publishes, and they do not
Loomloom.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
api.videoapi.video 78/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Vidyardvidyard.com 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Muxmux.com 52/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
JW Playerjwplayer.com 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Cleanvoicecleanvoice.ai 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Acastacast.com 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Brightcovebrightcove.com 22/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 Compare
Descriptdescript.com 48/100 1 Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Podbeanpodbean.com 36/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Dacastdacast.com 35/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Captivatecaptivate.fm 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.