Alternatives to Vimeo
Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Vimeo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Vimeo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Vimeo has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Vimeo does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Vimeo does not | Vimeo publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| api.videoapi.video | 78/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Simplecastsimplecast.com | 78/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Cleanvoicecleanvoice.ai | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Loomloom.com | 74/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Vidyardvidyard.com | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Auphonicauphonic.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| JW Playerjwplayer.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Descriptdescript.com | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Acastacast.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Dacastdacast.com | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Muvimuvi.com | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Libsynlibsyn.com | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.