SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Vidyard

Other Video and podcast hosting vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Vidyard. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from Vidyard on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Vidyard has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Vidyard” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at VidyardFound at Vidyard, not found there
Loomloom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Loom 61/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated Compare
Muxmux.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mux 52/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Dacastdacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dacast 43/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Simplecastsimplecast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simplecast 78/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
WeVideowevideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to WeVideo 70/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Subprocessor list Compare
api.videoapi.videoSee also Transparency alternatives to api.video 65/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Vimeovimeo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vimeo 43/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Auphonicauphonic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Auphonic 39/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Acastacast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Acast 35/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 Compare
SproutVideosproutvideo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SproutVideo 35/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Beamlybeamly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beamly 26/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare
Gumletgumlet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gumlet 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.