SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Cobalt

Other Vulnerability management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cobalt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Cobalt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cobalt has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Cobalt does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Cobalt does notCobalt publishes, and they do not
Invictiinvicti.com 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Snyksnyk.io 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 nothing Compare
Wizwiz.io 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Holm Securityholmsecurity.com 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Intruderintruder.io 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Mendmend.io 50/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Semgrepsemgrep.dev 48/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Detectifydetectify.com 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Acunetixacunetix.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Aqua Securityaquasec.com 39/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
JFrogjfrog.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
StackHawkstackhawk.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.