SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Manhattan Associates

Other Warehouse management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Manhattan Associates does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from Manhattan Associates on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Manhattan Associates has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Manhattan Associates does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Manhattan Associates does notManhattan Associates publishes, and they do not
EasyEcomeasyecom.io 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Fulfil.iofulfil.io 39/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Infoplusinfopluscommerce.com 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Generixgenerixgroup.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Logiwalogiwa.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
3PL Warehouseware2go.co 22/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Koerberkoerber-supplychain.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Geek+geekplus.com 26/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
AutoStoreautostoresystem.com 22/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
Element Logicelementlogic.net 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Balloon Oneballoonone.com 17/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cloud Fulfilmentcloudfulfilment.co.uk 13/100 1 Data location stated 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.