SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to AccessiWay

Other Web accessibility vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that AccessiWay does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 25 that differ from AccessiWay on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

AccessiWay has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and AccessiWay does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and AccessiWay does notAccessiWay publishes, and they do not
accessiBeaccessibe.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Evincedevinced.com 35/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Fablemakeitfable.com 30/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Dequedeque.com 26/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Siteimprovesiteimprove.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
A11yWatcha11ywatch.com 39/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Eye-Ableeye-able.com 26/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Accessibility Insightsaccessibilityinsights.io 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Monsidomonsido.com 13/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
ARIA Cloudariacloud.io 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Level Accesslevelaccess.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Silktidesilktide.com 4/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.