SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Eye-Able

Other Web accessibility vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Eye-Able. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 30 that differ from Eye-Able on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Eye-Able has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Eye-Able” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Eye-AbleFound at Eye-Able, not found there
Silktidesilktide.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Silktide 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
accessiBeaccessibe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to accessiBe 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
UserWayuserway.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to UserWay 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare
A11yWatcha11ywatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to A11yWatch 39/100 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Fablemakeitfable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fable 30/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Dequedeque.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deque 22/100 2 Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Starkgetstark.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Stark 22/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Evincedevinced.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evinced 35/100 1 Status page with history nothing Compare
AccessiWayaccessiway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccessiWay 33/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Siteimprovesiteimprove.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Siteimprove 22/100 1 Status page with history 1 Data location stated Compare
Accessibility Insightsaccessibilityinsights.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Accessibility Insights 17/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Level Accesslevelaccess.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Level Access 17/100 1 Data processing agreement 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.