Transparency alternatives to Evinced
Other Web accessibility vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Evinced. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Evinced on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Evinced has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Evinced” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Evinced | Found at Evinced, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silktidesilktide.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Silktide | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| accessiBeaccessibe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to accessiBe | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| UserWayuserway.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to UserWay | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| A11yWatcha11ywatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to A11yWatch | 39/100 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Fablemakeitfable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fable | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Starkgetstark.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Stark | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| AccessiWayaccessiway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccessiWay | 33/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Dequedeque.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deque | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Accessibility Insightsaccessibilityinsights.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Accessibility Insights | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Level Accesslevelaccess.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Level Access | 17/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Pope Techpope.techSee also Transparency alternatives to Pope Tech | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ARIA Cloudariacloud.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to ARIA Cloud | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.