Transparency alternatives to Silktide
Other Web accessibility vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Silktide. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from Silktide on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Silktide has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Silktide” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Silktide | Found at Silktide, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A11yWatcha11ywatch.comSee also Transparency alternatives to A11yWatch | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Evincedevinced.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Evinced | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Fablemakeitfable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fable | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
| accessiBeaccessibe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to accessiBe | 48/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| UserWayuserway.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to UserWay | 43/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| AccessiWayaccessiway.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AccessiWay | 33/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Eye-Ableeye-able.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Eye-Able | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Siteimprovesiteimprove.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Siteimprove | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Dequedeque.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deque | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Starkgetstark.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Stark | 22/100 | 1 Public pricing | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Accessibility Insightsaccessibilityinsights.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Accessibility Insights | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Level Accesslevelaccess.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Level Access | 17/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.