SaaS Ranking
Menu

Fathom Analytics: what they publish

usefathom.com · Web analytics · checked 2026-10-15

52/100DBand D

Rank 9 of 33 in Web analytics, where the median is 39.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-15. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

1 day since the newest dated result, 1 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

Fathom Analytics

usefathom.com · Web analytics

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 52of 100 Rank 9 of 33

Published commitments4 of 9 found

Measured behaviour2 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-15. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that Fathom Analytics has no such document.

Where Fathom Analytics sits in Web analytics

  1. A0 0%
  2. B3 9%
  3. C5 15%
  4. D7 21%
  5. E11 33%
  6. F7 21%
33 vendors with a score. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of Fathom Analytics is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What Fathom Analytics states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://usefathom.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://usefathom.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://usefathom.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://usefathom.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://usefathom.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://usefathom.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://usefathom.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Web analytics: 6 of 33 companies

✗

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

No statement about data location found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://usefathom.com/security – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://usefathom.com/trust – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://usefathom.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  4. https://usefathom.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  5. https://usefathom.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://usefathom.com/compliance – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  7. https://usefathom.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data location stated in Web analytics: 22 of 33 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.usefathom.com/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://usefathom.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://usefathom.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Web analytics: 9 of 33 companies

✗

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

No uptime figure found.

Checked 6 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 6 addresses we checked
  1. https://usefathom.com/legal/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://usefathom.com/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://usefathom.com/legal/service-level-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://usefathom.com/trust/sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://usefathom.com/uptime – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://usefathom.com/legal/uptime-sla – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Web analytics: 2 of 33 companies

✗

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

No security.txt found.

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-15.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://usefathom.com/.well-known/security.txt – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Web analytics: 9 of 33 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-15.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://usefathom.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://usefathom.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://usefathom.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://usefathom.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://usefathom.com/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://usefathom.com/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://usefathom.com/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Web analytics: 12 of 33 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 6
✓

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

Published and readable without a login.

Source: https://usefathom.com/legal/dpa · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Web analytics: 14 of 33 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://usefathom.com/pricing · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Public pricing in Web analytics: 20 of 33 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 63072000 seconds (730 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=63072000

    Read at https://usefathom.com/

Source: https://usefathom.com/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Web analytics: 23 of 33 companies

✓weight 2 of 3

No third-party requests before any interaction.

Source: https://usefathom.com/ · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Web analytics: 6 of 33 companies

✓

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

The vendor commits publicly to giving notice before the list changes.

  • Notice promised before the list changes 14 days.
    Show the exact wording

    We will provide 14 days notice of any plans to change an existing or add a new sub-processor.

    Read at https://usefathom.com/legal/dpa

Source: https://usefathom.com/legal/dpa · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Web analytics: 12 of 33 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (unclear from the sentence), SOC 2 Type II (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    Its service undergoes independent SOC 2 Type II audits, and ClickHouse holds ISO 27001 certification for its information security management system.

    Read at https://usefathom.com/legal/security

    PlanetScale publishes SOC 2 Type II reports and encrypts database data at rest and in transit, including its database backups.

    Read at https://usefathom.com/legal/security

Source: https://usefathom.com/legal/security · checked 2026-10-15

Across the market: Certifications named in Web analytics: 12 of 33 companies

History

100 0 2026-10-08: 52 of 1002026-10-15: 52 of 100 2026-10-08 2026-10-15
Score over the last 2 runs we measured Fathom Analytics in: 52 (2026-10-08), 52 (2026-10-15).

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

Fathom Analytics

6 found · 6 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-15.

Investigate 6 open evidence questions
  1. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  2. Data location stated

    Which locations apply to our primary data, backups and support access? Which region can we select for this plan?

    Inspect this check
  3. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  4. Uptime SLA with a figure

    Which availability commitment applies to our plan? Please include the measurement window, exclusions and credit claim process.

    Inspect this check
  5. security.txt (RFC 9116)

    Where should we report a vulnerability, and what acknowledgement and follow-up process should we expect?

    Inspect this check
  6. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.

Compared with

Each comparison lists only the criteria where the two differ, with the source for every one. All comparisons.