SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to FastBill

Other Accounting vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FastBill does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from FastBill on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FastBill has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and FastBill does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and FastBill does notFastBill publishes, and they do not
Odooodoo.com 48/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
FreeAgentfreeagent.com 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Xeroxero.com 42/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Billbill.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Clear Booksclearbooks.co.uk 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Wavewaveapps.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
QuickBooksquickbooks.intuit.com 27/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Lexware Officelexware-office.de 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Meliomelio.com 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Fortnoxfortnox.se 22/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Billomatbillomat.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Candiscandis.io 22/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.