Transparency alternatives to Everflow
Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Everflow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Everflow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Everflow has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Everflow” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Everflow | Found at Everflow, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reditusgetreditus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reditus | 74/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| PartnerStackpartnerstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PartnerStack | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Sovrnsovrn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sovrn | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Referral Rockreferralrock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Referral Rock | 43/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Affiseaffise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affise | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| Channelscalerchannelscaler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Channelscaler | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| belboonbelboon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to belboon | 35/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Awinawin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Awin | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Daisycondaisycon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Daisycon | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Rewardfulgetrewardful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rewardful | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Tapfiliatetapfiliate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tapfiliate | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| ReferralCandyreferralcandy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ReferralCandy | 22/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.