Transparency alternatives to Tapfiliate
Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Tapfiliate. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Tapfiliate on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Tapfiliate has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Tapfiliate” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Tapfiliate | Found at Tapfiliate, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reditusgetreditus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reditus | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| PartnerStackpartnerstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PartnerStack | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Everfloweverflow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Everflow | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| UpPromoteuppromote.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpPromote | 45/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LeadDynoleaddyno.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeadDyno | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Partneropartnero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Partnero | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Referral Rockreferralrock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Referral Rock | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Refersionrefersion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Refersion | 41/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Channelscalerchannelscaler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Channelscaler | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ingeniousingenioustechnologies.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ingenious | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Webgainswebgains.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Webgains | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Trackiertrackier.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Trackier | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.