Transparency alternatives to Reditus
Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Reditus. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Reditus on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Reditus has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Reditus” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Reditus | Found at Reditus, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Awinawin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Awin | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| ReferralCandyreferralcandy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ReferralCandy | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| PartnerStackpartnerstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PartnerStack | 61/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Everfloweverflow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Everflow | 57/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| LeadDynoleaddyno.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeadDyno | 43/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Referral Rockreferralrock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Referral Rock | 43/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Affiseaffise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affise | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| belboonbelboon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to belboon | 35/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Post Affiliate Propostaffiliatepro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Post Affiliate Pro | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
| Refersionrefersion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Refersion | 27/100 | 1 Status page with history | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Daisycondaisycon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Daisycon | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
| Tapfiliatetapfiliate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tapfiliate | 26/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.