SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Referral Rock

Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Referral Rock does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from Referral Rock on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Referral Rock has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Referral Rock does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Referral Rock does notReferral Rock publishes, and they do not
Reditusgetreditus.com 74/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
PartnerStackpartnerstack.com 61/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Awinawin.com 48/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Everfloweverflow.io 57/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Affonsoaffonso.io 50/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Named privacy contact Compare
LeadDynoleaddyno.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Affiseaffise.com 39/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data processing agreement Compare
belboonbelboon.com 35/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing Compare
Daisycondaisycon.com 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Named privacy contact Compare
Silverbeansilverbean.com 22/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Partneropartnero.com 43/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
ingeniousingenioustechnologies.com 39/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.