Transparency alternatives to Referral Rock
Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Referral Rock. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 40 that differ from Referral Rock on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Referral Rock has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Referral Rock” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Referral Rock | Found at Referral Rock, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reditusgetreditus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reditus | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| PartnerStackpartnerstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PartnerStack | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Everfloweverflow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Everflow | 57/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| LeadDynoleaddyno.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LeadDyno | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Channelscalerchannelscaler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Channelscaler | 39/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| belboonbelboon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to belboon | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Post Affiliate Propostaffiliatepro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Post Affiliate Pro | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Refersionrefersion.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Refersion | 27/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Awinawin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Awin | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Rewardfulgetrewardful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rewardful | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| UpPromoteuppromote.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpPromote | 45/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Partneropartnero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Partnero | 43/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.