Transparency alternatives to Post Affiliate Pro
Other Affiliate and partner marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Post Affiliate Pro. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Post Affiliate Pro on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Post Affiliate Pro has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Post Affiliate Pro” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Post Affiliate Pro | Found at Post Affiliate Pro, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reditusgetreditus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reditus | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| PartnerStackpartnerstack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PartnerStack | 61/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Referral Rockreferralrock.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Referral Rock | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Everfloweverflow.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Everflow | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| UpPromoteuppromote.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpPromote | 45/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Partneropartnero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Partnero | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Affiseaffise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affise | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Channelscalerchannelscaler.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Channelscaler | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| ingeniousingenioustechnologies.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ingenious | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Webgainswebgains.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Webgains | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Daisycondaisycon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Daisycon | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Sovrnsovrn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sovrn | 22/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.